Pearl iZUMi Men’s Quest Cycling Short

Pearl iZUMi Men's Quest Cycling Short

Rating:

List Price: $35.00
Discount: $0.00
Sale Price: $35.00
.

Availability: unspecified
Free Shipping: unspecified

Product Description

A perennial preferred, our well-known Quest Brief delivers worth, match, sturdiness and Tour 3D Chamois® comfort.

Details

Select transfer fabric sets the benchmark for moisture transfer and four-way performance stretch
6-Panel anatomic design for superior, chafe-free comfort, UPF 50+ sun protection
Comfortable silicone leg grippers keep shorts in place, moisture-wicking, antimicrobial properties
Tour 3D Chamois is male-specific and non-chafing with padding in key areas
86 percent nylon, 14% spandex, 9-Inch inseam

Pearl iZUMi Men's Quest Cycling Short 4.5 out of 5 based on 1,417 ratings. 1,417 user reviews

BestSellers - Men Most Wished For Pearl iZUMi Men's Quest Cycling Short A perennial preferred, our well-known Quest Brief delivers worth, match, sturdiness and Tour 3D Chamois® comfort. $35.00 http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41ty3Sn%2BU8L._SL160_.jpg

https://www.ridingjerseys.com/pearl-izumi-mens-quest-cycling-short/

No Responses to "Pearl iZUMi Men’s Quest Cycling Short"

MILDRED PEREZ says:

November 3, 2013 at 6:32 pm

I have actually undergone a LOT of bike shorts. From the $20 specials the the $120 “pro versions”. These bike shorts really feel equally good as the $120 designs. IF you are considering a cheapie pair of shorts, satisfy don’t do it. Inexpensive shorts are a waste of cash. THESE are quality shorts at a wonderful price. A “best bang for your dollar”. A few pointers on bike shorts as a whole that not everybody recognizes. ALL lines bike shorts are meant to be used without under garments! If you do not believe me, get out your google. If you are going to use undergarments, then never mind with bike shorts. LIKEWISE, you MUST clean your shorts after every usage. Offer them a fast clean in cool and hang dry.
DANIELLE ANDREWS says:

November 4, 2013 at 3:31 am

These look and feel superior. I’m very delighted with my purchase. When it comes to fit, I’m a male with a size 31 waistline and with medium-build legs (not jacked and not underweight), and the medium suits like a glove. I was right between SM and MEDICATION, yet opted for the size up considering that a many biking stuff runs small. The tiny is 28/30, and medium is 32/34, and although I’m a 31, the MEDICATION functions excellent.
RONALD MCCOY says:

November 4, 2013 at 10:57 am

This is the most comfy and ideal performing pair of cycling shorts I’ve had. The last pair of one more make had a comparable style of padding that I received from my bike shop. These much surpass those and at a much better rate. Distribution was suddenly fast as well. I’ll be getting a Second pair of these as opposed to switching over between this better pair and my older damaging down shorts (one is 5 years old, the other only 2 years and is already damaging down). I would suggest these to any person who’s trying to find a brand-new set.
STANLEY ELLIOTT says:

November 4, 2013 at 5:27 pm

I like them so much that I got a second pair, and I’ll buy a lot more in the future to slowly eliminate my aged ones. There’s a lot of padding in the chamois but it’s pliable sufficient to relocate with you. I’m still not all set to try bibs, so a great waistband is worth trying to find, especially on lengthy trips. The waist on these are a lot more comfy compared to a pair that I have that expense twice as much. Great leg hems, too. They stay in area and don’t really feel constrictive.
JOEL GRANT says:

November 5, 2013 at 1:16 am

I have a 33 inch waistline, and got the tool dimension Journey brief as an additional with the exact same size suggested an ideal fit, and is proper. Great biking brief for a beginner biker. Really comfy once you obtain made use of to the brief. As for myself, this is the very first biking short I’ve worn or gotten, and great for the $35 buck value. As for myself, I do not wear anything under the short. I take a fast shower, use some suave cucumber with aloe moisturizing cream to my thighs, butt and groin … essentially the saddle location where the short covers your skin. The firmness is something to obtain utilized to as is personal modifications. Well worth the convenience, and not chafing. The padding on this brief is more towards the butt location and thinner towards the taint and groin location. So as formerly stated, if your an enthusiastic biker and even more crouched in a wind resistant position, you could discover this short a little bit uneasy and or intend to locate a differently padded short. Great for beginners, 20-30 mile flight or 1-2 humans resources. The black colour is wonderful for hiding the perspiration, and I do sweat. Hopefully this assists. I’m 5’11” 160lbs 33″ waist.
NORMA PIERCE says:

November 5, 2013 at 11:45 am

These bike shorts, though expensive like the majority of specialized garments, are well worth the price. The material is comfy to put on for 20-25 miles a day and does not cause any kind of irritability on the skin. The hem sits well over the knee without the sewing excavating in to the skin. Very comfy to use. I am a 31 midsection and the tool matches flawlessly. The padding, while somewhat thicker compared to I had anticipated, is comfortable and does an excellent employment cushioning the butt for longer trips. The only problem I have observed sometimes is that when I stand during bike trips and saddle back again, the padding acquires a little bunched up towards the top. Does not cause any sort of discomfort, just really feels unusual for the very first immediate. I wish this doesn’t come to be a problem as the textile uses. The shorts are indicated to be cleaned and hung completely dry, do not place these in a clothes dryer – that will create the textile to shred extremely rapidly. Don’t forget to wash after every use, even if it’s only a 20-25 min ride. The material clings to the skin and you wish to make certain you are putting on tidy shorts in order to avoid any type of sort of bacterial or fungus infection. If you are not sure whether to get these shorts or are just searching for padding under your alreadying existing shorts, you could possibly take into consideration obtaining merely the inner liner from the same firm – Pearl Izumi Men’s Liner Short. These liners have the exact same padding, and could be used under any kind of shorts, they’re basically compression undershorts. I didn’t wind up buying the liners due to the fact that they were a lot more costly compared to the shorts. In conclusion, I am liking these shorts and these work well for my present trip ranges. If I begin using longer ranges, will update the review on exactly how these hold up.
MARIE MONTGOMERY says:

November 5, 2013 at 5:24 pm

I’m 50 years of ages and have actually been cycling in earnest for over 25 years (adhering to 25 years of vibrant biking). I’ve worn LOTS of shorts for many years (featuring woollen shorts with a leather chamois), and I could state that Pearl Izumi’s Journey shorts are the great stuff. I used mine for the initial time the other day for my normal 26-mile loop. Based upon this initial voyage, I really feel that the Quest shorts will be comfy for long flights (ONE HUNDRED+ miles) to come. The only unknown quantity is exactly how long they will last. Only time will certainly tell. But the product and the stitching seem excellent; I simply hope that the manufacturers made use of top quality sufficient thread that it will not damage down ahead of time. I got these for the very reasonable price of $50, and now I see they are even more affordable at $40, so I’m goinged to acquire a few additional pairs. At these rates, you can not fail. A tip: whatever shorts you use (Mission or otherwise), prevent the cleaning unit as long as you can. When you return from a ride, simply clean your shorts by hand with mild cleansing soap (I use Dr. Bronner’s) and a lot of water (paying specific focus on the crotch pad), and wash them well. Hang to completely dry. My shorts go in the washer only after many flights. I get long life out of my shorts in this way.- – – – – -Now a few days later. These shorts went on sale AND I acquired even more of a discount for registering for Amazon’s credit card, so I basically got these at half-price. I bought four even more pairs. Satisfied delighted. These excel shorts. Will use them till they drop of fatigue.
RAYMOND FRAZIER says:

November 6, 2013 at 2:53 am

These are the initial bike shorts I have ever before purchased, and I’m not a bike short kind of man, but after my last ride I required some added padding if you understand exactly what I mean. Those bike seats just aren’t comfy after a couple of miles. I generally wear a 36″ pants and acquired the large size of these shorts. They are a little tight, but hi they are bike shorts.;) They have a lot of padding and really make a difference when riding. I didn’t experience any sort of “free up” of the legs, they are tight yet actually feel ideal. Now I do not like the appearance of bike shorts, so I use these under my conventional cargo shorts, you can not even inform I have them on however I sure could tell a distinction. I suggest you acquire these if you are in the marketplace. For the cost you can’t defeat the cost and quality.
TODD ORTIZ says:

November 6, 2013 at 9:31 am

Got a century in a set of these and liked them so much I merely got two additional. Medium matched me well. I am 5’7 180lbs and solid 34 midsection.
WILLIE STEWART says:

November 6, 2013 at 7:48 pm

These shorts are the felines pyjamas. Seriously the pair they are switching out are over 10 years aged so they seem like heaven. The pad is a little bulky yet will mold and mildew in time I am sure.
MATTHEW BYRD says:

November 7, 2013 at 1:30 am

I’m type of brand-new to cycling, so I had not been truly certain just what to expect, yet it most definitely reduced the length of tension on my … teint I think you would call it? I assume they run a little on the smaller side, or my quads are merely larger. I’m 6’1 210 pounds, utilized to be muscular, now I’m type of “cosy” and the large were pretty tight around the area just above the knee, where it felt like it may have been removing circulation at some point but did not experience any sort of numbness, but they left indentations on my skin. I read some adverse evaluations regarding the padding aggravating the buttcheeks which had me kind of stressed, yet I have not experienced that in any way yet and I’ve used them about 4-5 times, and each time I rode 10-40 miles.
MICHELLE VARGAS says:

November 7, 2013 at 11:07 am

Have absolutely nothing bad to point out about these shorts. I know they’re not the first-rate, but also for where they fit into the product line they are excellent for the price and vs comparable competition. Padding suffices and fit is nice. I have actually suched as all my Pearl iZumi items and these are no exemption.
FRANCIS BARRETT says:

November 7, 2013 at 6:24 pm

These shorts are an excellent value. They have features that rival shorts of two times or 3 times the rate. At 200 # the L sit me completely if merely a little tight in the legs. The product is really slim and slick feeling (both good things), the high quality of stitching and completing is excellent, and I’m informed they look great also. Many notably, the shorts have a terrific pad. I don’t such as excessive padding and this feels like a pantload off the bike; however on the bike every little thing discovers the ideal place and it provides excellent comfort on the rest bones and in terms of rubbing. These are my selection for any flights over one hour.
RONALD LONG says:

November 8, 2013 at 1:26 am

April 9, 2011 – I’m 5-7″, 138 lbs and wear tool. I’ve been riding the Quest since Nov of 2010. The Quest are good for trips under FIFTY miles as they lack padding in the sit bone location. Overall the padding is slim however comfy, breathes well, and does not trash my private area. With this in mind, last month I acquired and prefer the Izumi Pearl Assaults w/8 panels a great deal more, a great deal a lot more. Come summer I’ll understand which is preferable to use with on warm days. I’ll post in the past. \*\*\*\*\*\* It’s Sept and I have actually put near to 1000 miles on the Attacks. These are my favs. The Quest now are utilized only when riding on my instructor as they do not supply sit bone shock alleviation reviewing bumps. For the $$, the Strikes are a good buy.
CARL MCCOY says:

November 8, 2013 at 10:48 am

At this rate point you can not expect excessive. $45. That’s entry degree for a solid brand name set of shorts. These are specifically that. Was hoping for a little a lot more padding in the seat– the primary reason I got a brand-new pair of shorts was due to the compression of the padding in my current shorts. Likewise, these run small. I have this issue fairly often since I’m appropriate on the cusp of a tool and a huge. So, some tools match wonderful and some are tight. These are tight. I’m a 32 waistline and I used the Pearl iZumi sizing info to make certain I got the best size … but in review, a Big could have been better for me. I have actually obtained narrow hips and a rather tiny ass so it’s merely the cut of the jib of these specific shorts. So if you are 32 / 33 / 34 midsection I would certainly recommend the Big.
JOE HUDSON says:

November 8, 2013 at 5:37 pm

So I virtually 50 and just returning in to cycling. My tail-end is not as challenging as it make use of to be and riding was as cheerful as I don’t forgets. So I thought I would certainly permit these shorts help me out. Well they function as expected. They pad the behind well. Being my very first set I have ever owned was not also sure just what to expect but they help a great deal. The only factor I marked them down was 2 factors and they are small aggravations. The initial is the front is padded. I am not as well certain why reason I am not riding on my personal components. The padding does cause additional stress their than I would have expected but it is comfortable. The 2nd is most likely not the shorts negligence but my stomach. I have a belly so the short to downsize and have the tendency to lot up in front. Once more not terrible simply have to remember to pull them up when and a while. Generally, every satisfied with the shorts for the cost.
ANDREW REED says:

November 9, 2013 at 3:29 am

This is my initial set of biking shorts, so I can not contrast them to various other items. Yet after reviewing the assessments on these, I made a decision to acquire them. I have a 33 midsection and for that reason acquired medium. In the beginning, I assumed they might be a little small, however tool is perfect. These hug the body and there is no draw-string, so you do not desire something too loose. Taking the suggestions of others here, I used them as is, without undergarments. That was the right option and I don’t also think an under-liner will be needed. The fabric ‘held’ what it had to in position, without rigidity, massaging, or pain. They were additionally rather comfy to walk around in after the ride, and unlike various other cycling shorts I have seen, they do not look large and strange. Despite the fact that these shorts squeeze the physical body, I didn’t experience any breakout or chafing after wearing them for a 10 mile (leisurely) ride in 82 degree heat. For what they are, they ‘breathe’ fairly well. My back didn’t really feel cushioned during the time I wore the shorts, and at the end of the ride, there was no irritation. Hence, the padding does just what it is expected to. As others have actually noted right here, it would be nice to have a vital pocket, so make certain you have a buns pack or something to bring your key in. Anyhow, I like the product and advise it. Do note that they are made in China, if that is a problem for you. June 1 update: I have now used these on a number of rides, upwards of 10 – 12 miles each time. Again, I have no basis of contrast, but these are constantly comfy, with no chaffing or discomfort. I stand by my preliminary assessment and recommend these. In fact, I’ll have them on for tomorrow’s trip … if these spring Albuquerque winds ever settle down.
JONATHAN BUTLER says:

November 9, 2013 at 10:58 am

these shorts are really comfy. I checked out some in a famous sporting products shop, and these are far much better. I just recently (October 2, 2011) used my age in miles using these shorts and they were comfortable the entire means. O’ yes I am 69 years old this month. I strongly advise this product!
LOIS HART says:

November 9, 2013 at 5:21 pm

These shorts match effectively and are extremely comfortable. The padding conforms well and the product seems to be of better compared to the other set of shorts I examined. The “elastic” around the legs does not draw on the hair on my legs (which various other shorts have done). Can not defeat the price for this quality.
SHEILA WELCH says:

November 10, 2013 at 1:48 am

The very same thing costs $50 or even more at bike shops. This is a large amount. I’m 6′ at 213lbs. Tried the XL size and that seemed a bit loosened where this L dimension matches a little bit more close, which is exactly what you want. These shorts remain wonderful and amazing, they don’t slip around on me and they’re of good construction. I’ll be getting a second pair to alternating with. These are my very first “actual” bike shorts and think me, I’m very happ with them!

Comments are closed.